Waterborne Transportation Study

2. Pierce County Waterborne Transportation Study Comment Form
   Public Meeting May 14, 2015

   Public Meeting May 14, 2015

6. A. Service

8. A1. How should the County respond to potential growth and increased demand for ferry service?

10. Manage demand

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

11. Add vehicle capacity

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

12. Accept greater delay

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

14. Comments

16. A2. Short-Term Service Options

18. Maintain current service level

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

19. Extend hours

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

20. Extend hours + Add frequency

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

22. Comments

24. A3. Long-Term Service Options

26. Year-round weekday expansion with peak service

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

27. Weekday expansion with peak and shoulder service

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

28. Peak all year

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

30. Comments

32. A4. Reservations and Communications

34. Reservations

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

35. Enhanced Communications

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

37. Comments

41. B. Fare Policy

43. B1. Vehicle to Passenger Fare Ratio

45. No Change: vehicle and passenger fares increase at same rate

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

46. Do not increase passenger fares. Meet revenue goals with vehicle fare increases

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

48. Increase passenger fares at a lower rate than vehicle fares

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

49. No charge for passengers

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

51. Comments

53. B2. Passenger Fare Type Ratios

55. No change

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

56. Increase youth discount

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

57. Increase senior and disabled discount

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

59. Comments

61. B3. Vehicle Size: Oversize and Small Car Fares

63. No change to oversize pricing

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

64. Set price per foot for oversize vehicles

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

66. Set increasing price per foot for oversize vehicles

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

67. Use smaller length categories

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

69. Comments

71. Create a small car fare

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

73. Comments

75. B4. Frequent Rider Discount

77. No change

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

78. Modify pass rules

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

79. Vary the passenger and vehicle value pass discount

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

81. Comments

83. B5. Congestion Peak Pricing

85. No change. Leave peak surcharge at 25%

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

86. Increase the peak surcharge

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

87. Create a three-tier surcharge schedule

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

89. Comments

91. B6. Monthly Pass Product

93. No change

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

94. Passenger-only monthly pass

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

95. Vehicle monthly pass

    1. Like
    2. Don't Like
    3. Unsure

97. Comments

101. C. Revenue Options

103. Establish a policy-level fare recovery rate

     1. Like
     2. Don't Like
     3. Unsure

104. Establish a policy-level fare recovery formula

     1. Like
     2. Don't Like
     3. Unsure

105. Broaden funding base through a Ferry District

     1. Like
     2. Don't Like
     3. Unsure

107. Comments

111. Overall Comments

113. Please provide any additional comments

Leave This Blank:


115. 1. Receive an email copy of this form.
116. Email address

     This field is not part of the form submission.

117. Submit

* indicates a required field