pierce county logo Pierce County mount rainier left mount rainier mount rainier left
Sheriff
horizontal page banner

Image of chemist

'The great forward strides made within professional law enforcement during the past 50 years must be attributed to a combination of many important developments. These include the adoption of scientific methods, the growth of modern transportation and communication facilities, the use of improved and new types of equipment, and the dedication of the trained, career oriented, law enforcement employee.

No one factor can be singled out as being individually responsible for the progress which has been achieved. If an attempt were made to list them in the order of dramatic and far reaching impact, a prominent place would be given to the science of fingerprint.'

Identification Sections or Forensic Investigation Sections, being particularly adapted in the field of Criminal Investigation, through the use of fingerprint have become, in the mind of the citizen, synonymous with locating and identifying criminal offenders. This is accomplished by comparing the latent or crime scene prints with the inked impressions of known offenders. Many criminals are brought to justice each year through this process. But it does have a more human side as well; the identification of children through their foot or fingerprints; restoring the identity of an amnesia victim; or by identifying the disaster victim.

However, the fingerprint identification process has been in actual practice for less than 90 years. In tracing the origin of the science of fingerprints we must draw a line of distinction between the realization of fingerprints of fingerprints and the operational use of fingerprints in the identification of people.

It is a noteworthy circumstance that the Bible holds many direct and indirect allusions to fingerprints and skin prints. The Apostle Paul used his own fingerprints to sign his letters (II Thessalonians 3:17).

While the western world was still in the period known as the Dark Ages, the Chinese were using fingerprints in their daily business and legal enterprises. The Chinese Law Book of Yung-Hwui written during the Tang period, about 650 AD, made mention of fingerprinting, commenting on an older method of preparing legal documents. His notation reads as follows: 'To divorce a wife the husband must give a document setting forth which of the seven reasons was assigned for the action... All letters should be written in the husband's own handwriting, but in case he is unable to write, he must sign with his fingerprints.'

Early in the twelfth century, a Chinese author, Shi-naingan, wrote a series of crime novels, entitled ' The Story of the River Bank '. In this work, the author makes reference to the use of fingerprints in the criminal identification. The translation reads as follows: 'WuSung captured the two women who had killed his brother. He compelled them to ink their fingers and recorded their fingerprints.' From this can we conclude that the science of fingerprints had already found its place in Chinese criminal practices?

It is conjectural to what extent these earlier instances of fingerprinting were intended for actual identification of persons impressing the prints. Certainly in some cases the object was simply to add more or less superstitious solemnity to business contracts, through the personal contact of the contracting parties' fingerprints with the written record.

A scientific approach to fingerprinting was essential before it could be put to practical use on any extensive scale. The scientific approach and acceptance by a recognized power came in 1901. That year marked the official introduction of fingerprinting for criminal identification in England and Wales. The system employed was developed by Mr. (later Sir) Edward Richard Henry, based upon the works of Sir Francis Galton. Henry simplified the fingerprint classification scheme and made it applicable to police identification. It is this basic Henry System, modified by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which is still in use by the FBI and throughout the United States. Although the FBI and many state, county and municipal agencies have given up the old Henry method for classification for the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) this computer process still uses the basic concepts of Henry to us as a search filter in limiting the number of candidates.

In 1917, People vs. Jennings, (IL) the Supreme Court granted judicial notice to the science of fingerprints, giving court acceptance and validity to the fingerprint identification as being a positive means for identification. In 1909, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was formed and in 1924, by an act of Congress, the Identification Section of the FBI was officially established.

In the mid 1930's, the Pierce County Sheriff's Bureau of Identification and Records Section was established to maintain fingerprint cards, certify identity, and to keep criminal records. Since the mid-1930's, the section has undergone major changes. It is now called the Pierce County Sheriff's Forensic Investigation Section; its role has changed significantly from record retention to forensic investigation. It now includes a lab used for drug testing and latent print processing as well as a video/photographic lab. It has primary responsibility for the AFIS and Mug photo computers, and is more field and crime scene oriented and searching for evidence of all types. But still of all the physical evidence sought at a crime scene, none is more valued than the fingerprint.

Fingerprint evidence is probably more conclusive and damaging to alibis and denials than any other form of evidence because it establishes, beyond any shadow of doubt, the presence of a suspect at a crime scene. This acceptance has been based on two basic and scientific principles. The physiological fact underlying the validity of fingerprint identification is that every fingerprint is unique, no two prints have been found to be exactly alike, and they do not change from birth to death.

Yet fingerprint evidence is not easily obtained. First, many criminals, aware of the incrimination associated with fingerprints, wear gloves or otherwise exercise care to avoid leaving prints at a crime scene. Second, identifiable prints cannot be obtained from all surfaces or under all conditions. As we expand our laboratory capabilities the number of surfaces that still remain for which prints cannot be obtained from are diminishing. Some day every surface may be able to give up its hidden fingerprint secrets.

Since fingerprints are not always found to establish the identity of a suspect, other types of evidence become equally as important. Locard's Principle of Exchange states...that it is almost impossible for a person to enter an environment or to have contact with another without leaving something behind. Therefore, it is up to the trained investigator to recognize it, preserve it, identify its value, and present that information in a court of law. That evidence could be, but is certainly not limited to, biological fluids, trace evidence (hairs, fibers, etc), tool, tire, and shoe impressions, bite marks, paint transfer, or evidence of an arson.

Technological advances enable analysis of even smaller particles, placing the even greater burden of the Forensic Investigator to find and collect evidence. The search must be done carefully and thoroughly. It can be very tedious and demanding work. Thereby, making training a very critical and on-going part of the Forensic Investigator routine.


Privacy Policy | Text Only Version | Webmaster

Copyright © 1996-2009 Pierce County Washington. All rights reserved.
             
Last Modified
Apr 26 2005 10:40AM